Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scan Tester"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
AliEllacott (talk | contribs) (New page: It would be good to have a linked audio file for musos like Scan: is that possible eventually? What is the plan editorially on audio links/files?) |
JohnnyAdams (talk | contribs) (Reply to query on Scan Tester and general audio.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | It would be good to have a linked audio file for musos like Scan: is that possible eventually? What is the plan editorially on audio links/files? | + | Ali Ellacott wrote: It would be good to have a linked audio file for musos like Scan: is that possible eventually? What is the plan editorially on audio links/files? |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Audio is planned but we have to get copyright permission and also decide on the technical methodology. If the copyright holders don't want music available as downloads then they'll have to be streams and this requires a streaming server. This is not beyond the bounds of possibility but will need extra finance, not just for the the 'box' but also to annually licence the software. | ||
| + | --[[User:JohnnyAdams|JohnnyAdams]] 00:53, 28 March 2007 (BST) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:53, 27 March 2007
Ali Ellacott wrote: It would be good to have a linked audio file for musos like Scan: is that possible eventually? What is the plan editorially on audio links/files?
Audio is planned but we have to get copyright permission and also decide on the technical methodology. If the copyright holders don't want music available as downloads then they'll have to be streams and this requires a streaming server. This is not beyond the bounds of possibility but will need extra finance, not just for the the 'box' but also to annually licence the software. --JohnnyAdams 00:53, 28 March 2007 (BST)