Folkopedia:Copyrights - Revision history

JohnnyAdams: Updated copyright statement

2021-06-17T22:52:12Z

Updated copyright statement

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:52, 17 June 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The ~~EFDSS takes~~ Copyright very seriously. The folk arts can be particularly tricky when it comes to Rights Management and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). Some of the raw material is hundreds of years old but that doesn't ''automatically'' mean that it is free of copyright restrictions. If somebody has added, arranged, rewritten or otherwise enhanced what was previously in the public domain, they may have a claim with regard to that material.		The Folkopedia team take Copyright very seriously. The folk arts can be particularly tricky when it comes to Rights Management and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). Some of the raw material is hundreds of years old but that doesn't ''automatically'' mean that it is free of copyright restrictions. If somebody has added, arranged, rewritten or otherwise enhanced what was previously in the public domain, they may have a claim with regard to that material.

JohnnyAdams at 17:44, 26 May 2009

2009-05-26T17:44:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:44, 26 May 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:


	There are no anonymous contributors on Folkopedia. ~~Usernames~~ will be people's real names or and everyone is expected to take direct responsibility for what they have contributed.		There are no anonymous contributors on Folkopedia. It is expected that usernames will be people's real names and everyone is expected to take direct responsibility for what they have contributed.

	If you wish to retain some control over your own contributions to Folkopedia, we suggest that you investigate the Creative Commons Licence. This is gaining in popularity and possibly offers a very powerful way of sharing your work without losing complete control over it. See the Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/ web site]		If you wish to retain some control over your own contributions to Folkopedia, we suggest that you investigate the Creative Commons Licence. This is gaining in popularity and possibly offers a very powerful way of sharing your work without losing complete control over it. See the Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/ web site]

JohnnyAdams at 22:34, 11 March 2007

2007-03-11T22:34:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:34, 11 March 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:


	Very often, people who '''''do''''' enhance traditional material are not interested in gaining from it and are happy to have their '''''version''''' in the public domain. This is not to be ''assumed'' by contributors without either asking the permission of the originator or at the very least crediting the originator. The methods of crediting IPR will be evolved along with the project.		Very often, people who '''''do''''' enhance traditional material are not interested in gaining from it and are happy to have their '''''version''''' in the public domain. This is not to be '''''assumed''''' by contributors without either asking the permission of the originator or at the very least crediting the originator. The methods of crediting IPR will be evolved along with the project.

JohnnyAdams at 22:33, 11 March 2007

2007-03-11T22:33:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:33, 11 March 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:


	Very often, people who ''do'' enhance traditional material are not interested in gaining from it and are happy to have their ''version'' in the public domain. This is not to be ''assumed'' by contributors without either asking the permission of the originator or at the very least crediting the originator. The methods of crediting IPR will be evolved along with the project.		Very often, people who '''''do''''' enhance traditional material are not interested in gaining from it and are happy to have their '''''version''''' in the public domain. This is not to be ''assumed'' by contributors without either asking the permission of the originator or at the very least crediting the originator. The methods of crediting IPR will be evolved along with the project.


	There are no anonymous contributors on Folkopedia. Usernames will be people's real names or and everyone is expected to take direct responsibility for what they have contributed.		There are no anonymous contributors on Folkopedia. Usernames will be people's real names or and everyone is expected to take direct responsibility for what they have contributed.

	If you wish to retain some control over your own contributions to Folkopedia, we suggest that you investigate the Creative Commons Licence. This is gaining in popularity and possibly offers a very powerful way of sharing your work without ~~loosing~~ complete control over it. See the Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/ web site]		If you wish to retain some control over your own contributions to Folkopedia, we suggest that you investigate the Creative Commons Licence. This is gaining in popularity and possibly offers a very powerful way of sharing your work without losing complete control over it. See the Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/ web site]

JohnnyAdams: Protected "Folkopedia:Copyrights": Policy makers only [edit=sysop:move=sysop]

2007-03-10T13:28:42Z

Protected "Folkopedia:Copyrights": Policy makers only [edit=sysop:move=sysop]

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:28, 10 March 2007
(No difference)

JohnnyAdams at 12:31, 8 March 2007

2007-03-08T12:31:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:31, 8 March 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:

	There are no anonymous contributors on Folkopedia. Usernames will be people's real names or and everyone is expected to take direct responsibility for what they have contributed.		There are no anonymous contributors on Folkopedia. Usernames will be people's real names or and everyone is expected to take direct responsibility for what they have contributed.

			If you wish to retain some control over your own contributions to Folkopedia, we suggest that you investigate the Creative Commons Licence. This is gaining in popularity and possibly offers a very powerful way of sharing your work without loosing complete control over it. See the Creative Commons [http://creativecommons.org/ web site]

JohnnyAdams at 11:26, 19 February 2007

2007-02-19T11:26:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:26, 19 February 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:


	Very often, people who '''do''' enhance traditional material are not interested in gaining from it and are happy to have their '''version''' in the public domain. This is not to be '''assumed''' by contributors without either asking the permission of the originator or at the very least crediting the originator. The methods of crediting IPR will be evolved along with the project.		Very often, people who ''do'' enhance traditional material are not interested in gaining from it and are happy to have their ''version'' in the public domain. This is not to be ''assumed'' by contributors without either asking the permission of the originator or at the very least crediting the originator. The methods of crediting IPR will be evolved along with the project.


	There are no anonymous contributors on Folkopedia. Usernames will be people's real names or and everyone is expected to take direct responsibility for what they have contributed.		There are no anonymous contributors on Folkopedia. Usernames will be people's real names or and everyone is expected to take direct responsibility for what they have contributed.

JohnnyAdams: New page: The EFDSS takes Copyright very seriously. The folk arts can be particularly tricky when it comes to Rights Management and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). Some of the raw material is hu...

2007-02-19T11:25:38Z

New page: The EFDSS takes Copyright very seriously. The folk arts can be particularly tricky when it comes to Rights Management and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). Some of the raw material is hu...

New page

The EFDSS takes Copyright very seriously. The folk arts can be particularly tricky when it comes to Rights Management and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). Some of the raw material is hundreds of years old but that doesn't ''automatically'' mean that it is free of copyright restrictions. If somebody has added, arranged, rewritten or otherwise enhanced what was previously in the public domain, they may have a claim with regard to that material.

Very often, people who '''do''' enhance traditional material are not interested in gaining from it and are happy to have their '''version''' in the public domain. This is not to be '''assumed''' by contributors without either asking the permission of the originator or at the very least crediting the originator. The methods of crediting IPR will be evolved along with the project.

There are no anonymous contributors on Folkopedia. Usernames will be people's real names or and everyone is expected to take direct responsibility for what they have contributed.